Secrets scanning vendors all claim to find leaked credentials. The differences that actually matter for an MSP are not in detection accuracy. They are in coverage, blast-radius context, multi-tenant support, and integration with the tools you already run.
This is the evaluation framework we recommend, followed by a comparison matrix of the tools most relevant to MSPs in 2026.
The five criteria that matter for MSPs
1. Coverage breadth
Does the tool scan code repositories only, or does it also cover SaaS platforms, cloud accounts, RMM and PSA systems, configuration files, and documentation stores? Code-only scanners catch a small fraction of MSP secret exposure.
2. Blast-radius scoring
Does the tool tell you how much access each found secret has, or just that it found one? An API key with read access to a single S3 bucket and a domain admin token are not the same finding. If your tool treats them the same, your triage queue will be unusable.
3. Multi-tenant context
Can the tool distinguish between secrets in your environment and secrets in each of your customers' environments, and can it report on them separately? MSPs need per-customer reporting for both operational use and customer-facing evidence.
4. RMM and PSA integration
Does it connect to ConnectWise, Datto, NinjaOne, Kaseya, Autotask, and Halo? Most secret exposure in MSPs originates in or flows through these platforms. A tool that ignores them is missing the highest-risk surface.
5. Channel-friendly pricing
Per-endpoint or per-seat pricing punishes MSPs for growth. Look for pricing models built for the channel, with margin built in and clear cost predictability as you onboard customers.
Comparison matrix
| Tool | Primary focus | Code coverage | SaaS / Cloud coverage | RMM / PSA integration | Blast-radius scoring | Multi-tenant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitGuardian | Code repo scanning | Strong | Limited | No | Basic | Limited |
| TruffleHog | Open-source code scanning | Strong | Limited | No | None | No |
| Gitleaks | Open-source code scanning | Strong | None | No | None | No |
| Entro Security | NHI lifecycle | Moderate | Strong | No | Strong | Limited |
| Astrix Security | SaaS NHI | Limited | Strong | No | Strong | Limited |
| Oasis Security | NHI governance | Moderate | Strong | No | Strong | Limited |
| Avistar | MSP-native NHI discovery | Moderate | Strong | Yes | Strong | Yes |
How to run the evaluation
Pick three tools that score well on coverage and blast-radius. Run a free trial on your own MSP environment first, not a customer environment. Count the findings, then sample 20 of them and verify whether the scoring matches your operational reality.
The tool that surfaces the dangerous secrets at the top of the list is the one to keep.
Where Avistar fits
Avistar was built for MSPs and MSSPs from day one. It discovers and risk-scores non-human identities across AWS, Azure, and on-premises Entra ID (with Google Cloud in active development), maps findings to per-customer tenants, and integrates with the RMM and PSA platforms MSPs already run. Pricing starts at $499 per month with margin built for the channel.
If you are running the evaluation above, start a scan on your own environment and see where Avistar lands on your five criteria.